A recent
article in The Economist
discusses how to avoid being asked to commit fraud. It can be very
uncomfortable if your manager asks you to alter the books or do anything that
is unethical. Often there are not only repercussions for committing the fraud
(i.e., fines or jail time), but also for not committing the fraud (21% of
employees who reported unethical behavior at work said they experienced some
form of punishment from their employer). If you refuse to commit a fraud, your
manager may choose not to promote you or may even fire you. Rather than refusing to commit a fraud, the
best scenario for an employee would be to never be asked to commit a
fraud. A study that was done by Dr. Sreedhari Desai (professor at the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) found one approach that dissuades
managers from asking employees to engage in unethical behavior.
Friday, March 25, 2016
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
Doping and Match Fixing: Has Tennis Crossed the Line?
News of professional tennis player Maria Sharapova failing a
drug test at the Australian Open has spread rapidly, especially since tennis is
generally considered a more sophisticated sport, and people don’t usually think
of tennis players when they think about athletes that are doping (see the video
below of the press conference where Sharapova made the announcement). While
Sharapova says that the drug she was taking was a medicine given to her for
health reasons that was only just recently banned by WADA (World Anti-Doping
Agency), she still takes responsibility for taking it after it became a banned
substance. Additionally, this situation has brought to light other instances of
potential fraud in professional tennis, including doping and fixing matches.
Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Advances in Technology for Auditing Firms: KPMG to Announce Deal with IBM Watson
A recent
article in The Wall Street Journal
discussed the technological improvements among auditing firms (KPMG in
particular). KPMG is expected to announce an alliance with IBM to use their
artificial-intelligence technology, IBM Watson, which will allow KPMG to audit
all of the data for their clients rather than only samples of the data. The
technology is not meant to replace human auditors, but will help them know
where abnormalities may exist in the client’s books.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)