We often hope to see the people
committing fraud receiving punishment. Unfortunately, this is not always the
case. A recent
New York Times article by Floyd Norris reports that Kun Huang spent two years
in a Chinese prison – not because he committed fraud, but because he detected
it. The consequences for reporting fraud are not generally quite as severe as
they were for Mr. Huang, but they do often include ridicule and other challenges
for many whistleblowers. While reporting fraud is an uphill battle, especially
in China, it is definitely one that is worth fighting.
Mr. Huang researched companies
that were newly listed on the United States’ and Canada’s stock markets. Over time,
the company he worked for gained a reputation for detecting fraud in Chinese
companies, and they published a list of those companies online. Mr. Huang
researched Silvercorp, a mining company with its largest mine in China. They
filmed trucks leaving the mine and sampled ore that fell off of the trucks,
which led them to publish a report stating that Silvercorp couldn’t be doing as
well as it had reported, due to the volume of trucks leaving the mine and
percentage of silver in the rock.
Mr. Huang reported his findings,
but instead of the Chinese government rewarding him for discovering fraud in a
company, he was arrested and spent two years in prison. When Mr. Huang was
originally arrested, the officers questioning him continually received phone
calls and then demanded further information about his investigations. Mr. Huang “believes [the calls] were from
Silvercorp officials.” In China it appears that Silvercorp had a lot of
influence over the judicial system and over what the punishment would be for
people who tried to report fraud or anything negative about their company. If
Silvercorp has this much power to manipulate the government to help them cover
fraud, are there other companies in China doing the same thing? Can financial reports
from Chinese companies be trusted? The SEC
apparently has similar questions, because earlier this year it banned the
Big 4 accounting firms from auditing U.S.-listed Chinese companies. By
suspending firms from auditing U.S.-listed Chinese companies, this could lead
to the companies not be able to trade because investors won’t have the data they
need in order to trade. Perhaps the SEC does not want some of these companies’
stock to be listed in the United States. Floyd Norris said the following in another
article about audits done in China:
“The board [The
PCAOB] has found small American firms that were certifying Chinese audits that
they basically did not do. And Chinese affiliates of the major firms have
audited, and approved, financial statements of Chinese companies that turned
out to be fraudulent. That does not prove their audits were badly done — good audits
can miss frauds — but it does provide an indication that improvements may be
necessary.”
It is clear from these accounts
that there are definitely issues in the reporting and auditing of financial statements in
China. As Floyd Norris said, “China has shown more hostility to those who found
the frauds than to those who committed them.” And after the imprisonment of Mr.
Huang, it appears as if the Chinese government would prefer to hide the
problems rather than to fix them.
In the United States, the
government does not punish the whistleblower for reporting fraud, and there are
not nearly as severe of consequences as there can be in China, but there are still
potential challenges for blowing the whistle on a company in the United States.
A few years ago an
airline pilot posted about security flaws he felt airports weren’t addressing,
and “a team of six federal agents and Placer County sheriff's deputies arrived
at the pilot's home to take the pilot's FFDO handgun and badge.” In another
well-known instance, Sherron Watkins reported fraud at Enron, and because of
the fraud that was committed thousands of employees at Enron lost their jobs. While
she did the right thing, she was subsequently treated with hostility by many
people within the company. Despite their good intentions, many whistleblowers
lose their jobs and experience other negative social consequences.
Although the whistleblower is often
treated with just as much animosity—if not more—as the fraudster themselves, it
is worth it to report fraud. Even though Mr. Huang spent two years in prison, the
reports that his company published led to seven companies being delisted from
the United States stock market, three of which the S.E.C. has filed fraud suits
against. Because those companies were delisted, investors around the world will
be protected from relying on falsified financial statements. In addition to
helping investors have reliable information, many whistleblowers
are also compensated with large monetary awards.
If you have noticed fraud and are thinking about reporting
it, have the courage to do the right thing, but be prepared and understand the
potential challenges coming your way. Reporting fraud is an uphill battle, but it is definitely one worth fighting. Be
grateful that in the United States reporting fraud is much easier than in
China. Learn more about whistleblower protection programs in the United States and
the rights you have by following this link.
No comments:
Post a Comment