I recently saw an email from someone who received a phone
call from a woman claiming to be from the IRS. The woman claimed that she was
calling because he (the person who received the call) was the target of a
criminal investigation. She went on to say that he needed to give her the name
of a lawyer that he wanted to represent him and that she could put him in touch
with one if needed. Luckily, in large part because the woman on the phone didn’t
speak very coherent English, he knew it was a scam. However, some people aren’t
so lucky.
Friday, September 26, 2014
Tuesday, September 23, 2014
Should Legal Penalties for Research Misconduct be Similar to Those for Fraud?
Research misconduct (when research is falsified or
plagiarized) has historically been dealt with internally, but Richard Smith
thinks that should change. In The
New Scientist, Smith argues that “Research misconduct degrades trust in
science and causes real-world harm. As such, it should be a crime akin to fraud.”
False research essentially causes people to believe in something that is
incorrect, which can affect their actions—not unlike the way that financial
statement fraud can change people’s investment decisions. Smith gives several
reasons why research misconduct should be illegal and discusses how it should
be treated in our society.
Thursday, September 11, 2014
Reporting Fraud: An Uphill Battle, Especially in China
We often hope to see the people
committing fraud receiving punishment. Unfortunately, this is not always the
case. A recent
New York Times article by Floyd Norris reports that Kun Huang spent two years
in a Chinese prison – not because he committed fraud, but because he detected
it. The consequences for reporting fraud are not generally quite as severe as
they were for Mr. Huang, but they do often include ridicule and other challenges
for many whistleblowers. While reporting fraud is an uphill battle, especially
in China, it is definitely one that is worth fighting.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)