tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6581586488456314302.post7487277091200168828..comments2023-12-08T00:05:03.649-07:00Comments on FraudBytes: Lance Armstrong Investigation: What We May Learn in the EndAaronhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10138733175602274983noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6581586488456314302.post-52466114037235220122010-09-17T11:55:09.982-06:002010-09-17T11:55:09.982-06:00"Hopefully we will learn more about why the t..."Hopefully we will learn more about why the timing of these things" is one of the most strangely worded sentences I've ever read in what is otherwise a nicely-written article.jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12151905844062548679noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6581586488456314302.post-50437229271365625682010-09-09T05:59:49.791-06:002010-09-09T05:59:49.791-06:00Kristin was not his wife then.Kristin was not his wife then.Brian Laffertyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07729963757834654649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6581586488456314302.post-87973739828782555382010-09-08T14:41:15.658-06:002010-09-08T14:41:15.658-06:00The UCI "investigation" in response to t...The UCI "investigation" in response to the positive tests on LA's 1999 TdF urine was rejected by WADA as invalid and unprofessional. This "investigation" consisted of lawyerly whitewash (look for it online and read it), not real scientific invalidation of the results. The scientist involved in designing the testing (not just lab techs), Mike Ashenden, of Australia, is absolutely convinced that LA used EPO in the 1999 TdF.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15268884193099441488noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6581586488456314302.post-58834920928808663882010-09-08T13:38:50.393-06:002010-09-08T13:38:50.393-06:00long but worth readinglong but worth readingKarenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07423334896632136328noreply@blogger.com